|
Yesterday I be so very happy to see that there be so friends celebrating my birthday...
Be:
I be
you be
he/she/it be
we be
you be
they be
Past tense:
I be
you be
he/she/it be
we be
you be
they be
Simplification
The time = t'time
The name = t'name
Please don't post as n'guest. Choose t'more original name(Please don't post as the guest. Choose the more original name)
|
|
Yesterday Ik was soa altue happiy too seen that thear aren swoa maniy frends begladderind and abreemind mijn birthday (--bij the wey, *Sealiy Birthday!*)
Been:
Ik am
thou art
he/she/it is
we aren
ye aren
they aren
Forthwitten tijd:
I was
thou wert/wast
he/she/it was
we weren
ye weren
they weren
Offoldetting:
The time = the tijm
The name = the naam
Bliss don't errandmarken as "guest". Choose a moar ordfrem naam(Bliss don't errandmarken as the "guest". Choose a moar ordfrem name)
|
|
Even Newer English Grammar:
"Yesterday I be so very happy to see that there be so friends celebrating my birthday... "
--> Yesterday I very happy see many friends celebrate my birthday.
be, am, is, are, was, were, the --> all go to hell
|
|
further simplification:
friends -> friend
my -> me
I -> me
celebrating -> celebrate
"Yesterday me be so very happy to see that there be so many friend celebrate me birthday... "
Removing some excess verbiage:
"Yesterday me very happy see so many friend celebrate me birthday... "
|
|
Simplifying quantifiers by adding an extra "s":
very happy -> happys
so many friends -> so friendses
With clitic shortened pronouns everywhere possible:
I was / I be -> bem ; we can't delete the subjet, otherwise we no longer know who is happy
my birthday -> birthdaym
Useless "to"
to see -> see
Yesterday bem happys see so friendses celebrate birthdaym.
That's ugly isn't it ? :-D
|
|
Or even
Yesterday happysm see so friendses celebrate birthdaym.
^^
|
|
Why does everyone want so much to simplify English???
Isn't it simple enough as is?
Sheeesh
|
|
|
When I saw the thread title, I thought it was about the grammar of New English.
|
|
<<When I saw the thread title, I thought it was about the grammar of New English. >>
It's unclear how much the grammar of English in New England differs from GAE grammar.
|
