plural of Aircraft

HansM   Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:13 am GMT
I just read the other topic about plural for "sheep", "cattle", "deer", "goose" etc.
It was stated that only for "animals" the "s" or "es" is not used.
So no deers or gooses.

However, since i'm working in aircraft industry, i'm curious on the following:
What is the plural of "Aircraft". Is it "Aircrafts"?
Is it "British Airways has many Aircrafts in his fleet" or "British Airways has many Aircraft in his fleet"
???   Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:57 am GMT
Aircraft
trivial   Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:01 am GMT
Use a fucking dictionary, paper or online. But I think you know the answer to your own question. Idiot.
aircleft   Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:04 am GMT
And all these years I've been saying "aircrafts".

The dictionaries have it wrong!

I don't care; I won't be saying "10 aircraft" any time soon.
davo   Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:12 pm GMT
the plural of sheep is sheepsies
an aĆ«roplane   Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:34 pm GMT
You can circumvent the problem by using the word 'aeroplane'.
geese's   Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:52 pm GMT
<<So no deers or gooses.>>

Looking for the word "gooses"? :

http://www.geocities.com/alaskangoose/GoosesForSale.html
Lazar   Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:30 pm GMT
Unlike "sheep", "deer" and "goose", the word "cattle" is a non-counting noun and can never be used in the singular. "Geese" does have a distinct plural form, "geese", although I think it might be optional to use "goose" as a collective plural in some contexts (like hunting, maybe?).
Caspian   Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:39 pm GMT
The plural of 'aircraft' is the same as the singular.
LL   Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:30 pm GMT
I think posters should be allowed, maybe even required to post the question in their native language first, then in English.
Chuso   Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:05 am GMT
In Spanish:

Aeroplano, Aeroplanos
Avion, Aviones
Planeador, Planeadores
Aeronave, Aeronaves
etc.
Caspian   Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:50 am GMT
But my native language is English - does that mean I'd have to write it twice?
Damian in Edinburgh   Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:44 pm GMT
Goose = Geese
Mongoose = Mongooses

We are so fortunate to have English as a delightfully irregular Language. I love it to bits - well, it does pay all my bills.
???   Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:23 pm GMT
English isn't very irregular in terms of its basic grammar, is it? There are only a handful of irregular plurals and the only other real irregularity the past tenses of some verbs, but even this is less than in most languages. However I would agree it does have some odd little rules that make it hard to master.
Uriel   Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:25 pm GMT
<<I think it might be optional to use "goose" as a collective plural in some contexts (like hunting, maybe?). >>

In hunting, most prey animals become plural in the singular -- you not only hunt deer, but also goose, elk, dove, mountain lion, fox, etc. It's like jargon. You wouldn't necessarily use that form in other contexts.