New English grammar
Yesterday I be so very happy to see that there be so friends celebrating my birthday...
Be:
I be
you be
he/she/it be
we be
you be
they be
Past tense:
I be
you be
he/she/it be
we be
you be
they be
Simplification
The time = t'time
The name = t'name
Please don't post as n'guest. Choose t'more original name(Please don't post as the guest. Choose the more original name)
Yesterday Ik was soa altue happiy too seen that thear aren swoa maniy frends begladderind and abreemind mijn birthday (--bij the wey, *Sealiy Birthday!*)
Been:
Ik am
thou art
he/she/it is
we aren
ye aren
they aren
Forthwitten tijd:
I was
thou wert/wast
he/she/it was
we weren
ye weren
they weren
Offoldetting:
The time = the tijm
The name = the naam
Bliss don't errandmarken as "guest". Choose a moar ordfrem naam(Bliss don't errandmarken as the "guest". Choose a moar ordfrem name)
Even Newer English Grammar:
"Yesterday I be so very happy to see that there be so friends celebrating my birthday... "
--> Yesterday I very happy see many friends celebrate my birthday.
be, am, is, are, was, were, the --> all go to hell
further simplification:
friends -> friend
my -> me
I -> me
celebrating -> celebrate
"Yesterday me be so very happy to see that there be so many friend celebrate me birthday... "
Removing some excess verbiage:
"Yesterday me very happy see so many friend celebrate me birthday... "
Simplifying quantifiers by adding an extra "s":
very happy -> happys
so many friends -> so friendses
With clitic shortened pronouns everywhere possible:
I was / I be -> bem ; we can't delete the subjet, otherwise we no longer know who is happy
my birthday -> birthdaym
Useless "to"
to see -> see
Yesterday bem happys see so friendses celebrate birthdaym.
That's ugly isn't it ? :-D
Or even
Yesterday happysm see so friendses celebrate birthdaym.
^^
Why does everyone want so much to simplify English???
Isn't it simple enough as is?
Sheeesh
When I saw the thread title, I thought it was about the grammar of New English.
<<When I saw the thread title, I thought it was about the grammar of New English. >>
It's unclear how much the grammar of English in New England differs from GAE grammar.