I was just reading something by professor of phonetics, John Wells, who states that:
"If we take the word singer, one who sings, we see that for most of us the stem-final [g] was lost just as in sing itself. But in finger, on the other hand, where the [g] is in the middle of a stem, it remains. Hence for most speakers singer [?s???] and finger [?f??g?] do not rhyme. But in the local speech of Liverpool and Manchester they do, because in [?s??g?] we get just the same sequence as in [?f??g?]. The same thing applies if we compare kingly with singly, which rhyme in Manchester but not in London or Los Angeles."
Being from Manchester these always rhyme for me. Can someone confirm if what John Wells says is true and that these words don't rhyme elsewhere.
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/yorksdial-uni.htm
"If we take the word singer, one who sings, we see that for most of us the stem-final [g] was lost just as in sing itself. But in finger, on the other hand, where the [g] is in the middle of a stem, it remains. Hence for most speakers singer [?s???] and finger [?f??g?] do not rhyme. But in the local speech of Liverpool and Manchester they do, because in [?s??g?] we get just the same sequence as in [?f??g?]. The same thing applies if we compare kingly with singly, which rhyme in Manchester but not in London or Los Angeles."
Being from Manchester these always rhyme for me. Can someone confirm if what John Wells says is true and that these words don't rhyme elsewhere.
http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/yorksdial-uni.htm