Cloning - Can you correct my mistakes

Xam   Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:34 pm GMT
Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of something.
Cloning a cell means to derive a population of cells from a single cell. A

clone shares all the genetic characteristics of the original cell. However,

we must differentiate between the scientific definition and the definition of

the general public

In fact, when we talk about cloning in the general public, they immediately

think about the technique is to create an individual with the help of stem

cells. While scientists speak of clones from the moment two cells have the

same genetic heritage. They distinguish between clone "in vivo" when it comes

to individuals and clones "ex vivo" when it is simply cells.

Thus according to the scientific definition, contrary to what we may think,

cloning is something that has existed for a long time and is widely practiced

in nature. Indeed, for example in humans, the cells renew themselves by

multiplying at the same: it’s the mitosis.

After fertilization, we can also observe the phenomenon of cloning:

Initially there is a cell that makes mitoses then each cell specializes in a

spot to give cells in the heart, brain, eyes… Cloning is a completely natural

phenomenon.

As for manipulation by human cloning, contrary to popular belief, it is also

long overdue. Indeed, first in plants, cloning results in the plant cuttings:

in taking a rod and the replanting creates a new plant, which have exactly

the same genetic inheritance, it is a clone.

Dolly, a female sheep was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult

somatic cell, using the process of nuclear transfer.

The technique of cloning provides a solution for the survival of endangered

species. So in January 2001, on a farm in Iowa was born wild ox. Noah is the

first clone obtained from the cells of an animal in danger of extinction. It

will still required 700 eggs from cow to arrive at the result.

But is striving to repopulate the species almost extinct from a very low

genetic diversity? Will extend the feat in recreating species disappeared

completely as the Tasmanian tiger that some would like to see revived?

Cloning is another solution to treat certain diseases such as Parkinson's

disease and Alzheimer's. They may treat spinal cord sections, something that

has been practiced successfully in rats. And the risks of rejection are

virtually non-existent because the stem cells come from the individual

treaty. So thanks to cloned cells, we can cure diseases still very poorly

controlled nowadays…

Cloning is also as a solution to the sterility of a couple. Currently, the

couple use of donated gametes: The child who is born, has a genetic heritage

sometimes totally different if both spouses are sterile. Now, thanks to

cloning, it would be enough to charge cell nuclear any of the couple and the

child that would result corresponds to a combination genetic quite random and

unique.

There are many problems caused by cloning. Firstly, there are difficulties

associated with the birth and survival of clones. We found an aging faster

than normal at Dolly.
Moreover, although theoretically the cloning appears to be a simple

technique is well known, obtaining a clone is difficult. For example, Dolly

was born after 300 attempts.


Transplantation of organs and tissue from animals to humans is dangerous.

Studies show that retroviruses are believed to be at transplatation.

In addition, although cloning is establishing itself as the solution to

species extinction, it can also lead to the disappearance of a species.

Indeed, the survival of a species through the centuries is based on the

diversity of their genetic heritage: the rich heritage, allows a person to be

better armed to deal with viruses and epidemics.

Finally, it seems that all the advantages offered by cloning seem to be

totally utopian: all these notions are still largely inaccessible today.

However, although all applications are still within the realm of dreams,

those ideas are necessary for the progress of science and to guide the

research. Unfortunately, at present, there seems to be more disadvantages

than advantages to practice cloning.


In addition to these technical problems, the most important problems are the

ethical issues such as cloning a deceased child, the concept of eternal life

and of course the fear Drift…

Finally, many moral questions are raised today about the cloning. What are

the limits of cloning? And what impact can lead to the human race? All these

questions, of course, the slow development of technology and research, but

one of the essential elements of these discussions is to avoid any blunders

that could have irreversible consequences on humans. That is why all this is

necessary. Indeed, they enable scientists to be aware of the dangers and

risks they can to avoid slippage. In addition, they can also lead to better

research as required… These ethical issues no longer act as an indispensable

guide rather than a brake.


Thank for your help, if you don't understang a sentence, say it. Thank
furrykef   Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:39 pm GMT
I hate to say it, but I don't think this is the place for a critique like this. I doubt you'll get much of a response here for something so long.
Guest   Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:47 pm GMT
Go clone your mother and fuck both of them afterwards
Guest   Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:05 pm GMT
I'm non-english and i would like you correct my mistake.